Equivocal outrage: Cincinnati race riots anniversary and Trayvon Martin

Photo: Protestors gather at the scene of the fatal police shooting of Timothy Thomas where a memorial has been placed in the alleyway near Republic Street. Photo source: Cincinnati Enquirer, Google Images

Protestors rally at the scene of Thomas's murder during the Cincinnati race riots. | The Cincinnati Enquirer

TRIGGER WARNING: This post contains content about racialized violence and police brutality.

It’s hard to believe it’s been 11 years since Timothy Thomas was gunned down by Cincinnati police officer Steven Roach. Thomas was recognized by police as a wanted man—he had a slew of minor misdemeanor warrants for offenses like loitering and not wearing a seat belt—and when police approached Thomas, he took off running. Eventually, he turned down a dark alley and Roach shot and killed Thomas, claiming Thomas appeared to be reaching for a weapon. Although Roach was acquitted of criminal charges in the incident, internal investigations would later find he did not follow proper procedure for handling a firearm in pursuit of a suspect and that Roach was intentionally dishonest about this in reports.

The Thomas shooting was the last straw in a long history of police brutality and questionable use of deadly force—in the six years before the riots, 15 black men died in confrontations with Cincinnati Police. People rioted for four days, mostly in Over-the-Rhine, after Thomas’ death. It was the largest urban uprising since the 1992 L.A. riots. Mayor Charlie Luken enacted a curfew, arresting everyone on the Cincinnati streets. The curfew coupled with a heavy downpour quelled the riots.

Photo: A store front burns during the Cincinnati race riots. Photo source: Cincinnati Enquirer, Google Images

A store burns during the riots. | Cincinnati Enquirer

These deaths were not isolated incidents. From 1991 to 2001, Cincinnati faced at least 137 lawsuits alleging improprieties by its police officers. And all of this goes hand-in-hand with the historical undercurrent of neglect and disrespect toward the urban black community in Cincinnati: extremely high poverty rates and the cultural mindset that poor people—not poverty—are the problem; unproportionally harsh sentences for minor crimes; segregation into white and black neighborhoods; and uprooting low-income black families to make way for “revitalization projects” in primarily black neighbors like Over-the-Rhine or to build I-75 through the Westend.

Some Cincinnati leaders saw the riots coming. “There’s a potential for violence. I hate to raise that issue, but I think there is,” said Karla Irvine, then executive director of Housing Opportunities Made Equal, at a community meeting on race relations two months before the riots.

“White people and city leaders need to step up, because until that happens it’s too easy to see it as a black concern or a concern to only of people of color,” said Cheryl Nunez, then affirmative action director at Northern Kentucky University, at the same meeting.

“Many whites are suffering from race fatigue or denial: ‘Let’s just stop talking about it, and things might get better.’ It won’t happen,” said Linda Bates Parker, then director of Career Development Center at the University of Cincinnati, at the same meeting.

Rev. Damon Lynch, president of the Black United Front, called for a boycott of the city. Conventions and celebrities—including Bill CosbyWhoopi GoldbergWynton MarsalisSmokey RobinsonAl Roker and Barbara Ehrenreich—refused to schedule events and appearances in the city. Estimates indicate the city lost $10 million during the year-long boycott.

Class action and wrongful death lawsuits were filed. Investigations were launched. A collaborative agreement was reached. Reforms were made. But little has changed. And only the people who lived in Cincinnati during that time really remember the riots, let alone Thomas’s murder.

Photo: Head shot of Trayvon Martin, a young black man with short hair wearing a red T-shirt. Photo source: Google Images

Trayvon Martin | The Daily Mail

This is why the outrage over Trayvon Martin’s murder is so, well, outrageous. About one-fifth of the total news space earlier in the week was devoted to the Martin shooting, Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism reported April 4. Suddenly police brutality and racism is being talked about in the mainstream media and all over the internet like it’s something that just recently became an issue. It was an issue long before the riots, and it’s still an issue now.

The Martin and Thomas cases are similar. Both were young black men in their late teens, who appeared to have a weapon and were shot in alleged self-defense. And while Martin’s killer wasn’t a police officer, George Zimmerman is an extension of the police force and a cog in the criminal justice system that is overwhelmingly racist and classist.

It took over a week for the Martin case to spread beyond local news. Martin was shot Feb. 26, but it wasn’t until Martin’s father appeared on Good Morning America on March 10, calling for Sanford police to arrest Zimmerman and release 911 tapes, that any sort of national public outrage sparked. This is because the murder of a young black man by an authority figure isn’t news because it’s something that happens all the time. But the Martin case is shocking and newsworthy because the injustice is fairly clear cut—he was a “good,” non-criminal black man who was unjustly murdered. And all of this rhetoric still works within the systems of oppression that lead to Martin’s murder; if there was any shadow of a doubt that Martin wasn’t “good,” his murder would be talked about very differently, and probably not even be called a murder.

Granted, media was different during the time leading up to and during the riots. The majority of the world didn’t have access to the internet, and if they did, they used dialup. Gmail didn’t exist, and Wikipedia was in its infancy. People still relied on physical newspapers, broadcast TV and radio for news, rather than their Facebook feed. And the Martin case went viral once it hit the national news, as did commentary on it.

What hasn’t gone viral? The stories of 28 black men who have died at the hands of police or other keepers of the peace since the beginning of 2012, 16 of which have been since Martin’s death. Of those 28, 18 were definitely unarmed and 8 were alleged to have non-lethal weapons. And those are just the ones who have been reported. There is no outrage for these people. And history keeps repeating itself.

About these ads

8 thoughts on “Equivocal outrage: Cincinnati race riots anniversary and Trayvon Martin

  1. Pingback: Equivocal outrage: Cincinnati race riots anniversary and Trayvon Martin | QClick Radar

  2. Pingback: Blacks Can Murder Whites, and It Won’t Make National News « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  3. I appreciate and share your frustration over all the other death suffered at the hands of PoC, particularly young men, but I think maybe rather than be upset at the coverage of the Martin case, we should take out of this that finally people are talking about it.

    It pisses me off that it hasn’t happened before too. It pisses me off that too many white people, less than in the past but still there, across the political spectrum STILL want to pretend that race isn’t a factor in ANY of these killings. It pisses me off that too many white people, again less than in the past but still there, want to claim some kind of victim-hood because the rest of us are finally speaking about this. And yes, like you, it DOES piss me off that very little of the media is taking this opportunity to talk about all the other cases.

    Still, I am happy that we are probably getting the strongest dialogue on race that we have seen at least since the “civil rights era” (in quotes because in the minds of too many whites that was when racism “ended”) and possibly ever. If there is a silver lining to be taken from these parents (not just Trayvon’s) having to bury their sons so young, it is that, though in their shoes I doubt anyone would see it that way.

    • That’s true. I didn’t mean in any way to indicate that talking about racialized violence and Trayvon Martin is bad, I just wanted to examine the way in which we as a society—especially through the lens of media—participate in discussion of it.

  4. Pingback: Rash of Ohio hate crimes indicative of historical context, culture « Stuff Queer People Need To Know

  5. Pingback: A Rash of Hate Crimes in Ohio: Stories of Oppression, Stories of Hope « In Our Words

  6. Pingback: Nico Lang: When in Boystown: Don't Create Racism, Create Change | USA Press

  7. Pingback: When in Boystown: Don’t Create Racism, Create Change « In Our Words

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s